<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>comments for poster "Think" by alina at durexhibit.co.uk</title>
<description></description>
<link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/</link>
<copyright>durexhibit.co.uk</copyright>
<item>
 <title>schwookles commented:</title>
 <description>Nice idea, but I wasn't too what it meant.</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3220</link>
 <pubDate>18th Dec 2007 16:48PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3220</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LukeW commented:</title>
 <description>Good poster, glad you stayed with your original idea with the black and white. I think the "Think, in" is clear, well done :)</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3223</link>
 <pubDate>18th Dec 2007 16:58PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3223</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>sallylinsdell commented:</title>
 <description>i dont get it?</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3226</link>
 <pubDate>18th Dec 2007 17:36PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3226</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>shafrulz commented:</title>
 <description>ok people who don't get this poster r thick i think, no offense! its obvious!! i like it coz its simple but will be effective! good job!!</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3228</link>
 <pubDate>18th Dec 2007 17:50PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3228</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sparkysparks commented:</title>
 <description>yeah this doesnt have any connection with safe sex concerns, plus, they dont seem to like the simple approach</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3232</link>
 <pubDate>18th Dec 2007 21:01PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3232</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Exhibitdc commented:</title>
 <description>two attitudes of 'think' and 'thinkin' work.</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3236</link>
 <pubDate>18th Dec 2007 22:01PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3236</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>willwillwill commented:</title>
 <description>i don't understand 'think'? 'think in'? 'thinkin'? which one is it? not that any of them really make sense</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3301</link>
 <pubDate>21st Dec 2007 17:14PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3301</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>tlamond commented:</title>
 <description>this idea is obviously caused stir between people n got them talkin that makes a could advertisement love it!! how could u make this a campaign tho?</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3354</link>
 <pubDate>24th Dec 2007 13:38PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3354</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>craig_scott commented:</title>
 <description>alina is so clever</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3443</link>
 <pubDate>2nd Jan 2008 00:18AM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3443</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>matthew_pl commented:</title>
 <description>Use your head, it's clear. Great and simple!</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3486</link>
 <pubDate>5th Jan 2008 19:28PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3486</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>piterek1795 commented:</title>
 <description>I don't know what to say it's great - simple and obvious the best poster</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3489</link>
 <pubDate>5th Jan 2008 20:50PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3489</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>paulina commented:</title>
 <description>it's really good idea. Nice work!</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3494</link>
 <pubDate>6th Jan 2008 11:29AM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3494</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>dasia commented:</title>
 <description>simple, straight and well done:)</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3517</link>
 <pubDate>7th Jan 2008 19:36PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3517</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>yalison commented:</title>
 <description>I was going to explain this idea for those who are dumber but I can't be bothered. Just don't have sex if you don't get it!</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3553</link>
 <pubDate>9th Jan 2008 20:42PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3553</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>brendonfraser commented:</title>
 <description>So good</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3554</link>
 <pubDate>9th Jan 2008 21:15PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3554</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4das commented:</title>
 <description>great</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3555</link>
 <pubDate>10th Jan 2008 00:12AM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3555</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Julio_Nescafe commented:</title>
 <description>I don't thINk' this advert is as clever as it seems to think it is.

Its message is too convaluted/confused to ever make anybody rethink their approach to condoms.

You're going to need a lot more friends to rate this highly because apparently they're the only ones clever enough to fully understand this simple and obvious message.</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3578</link>
 <pubDate>10th Jan 2008 15:26PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3578</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>yadziak commented:</title>
 <description>Clear and smart idea. I like it.</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3629</link>
 <pubDate>10th Jan 2008 18:17PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3629</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MF_SICKONE commented:</title>
 <description>this advert provokes no reaction, and conveys no meaning, but considering you study in a collage, not a college... very well done</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3669</link>
 <pubDate>11th Jan 2008 13:28PM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3669</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ky1 commented:</title>
 <description>nice and simple, eye catching and gets you "thinking" =]</description>
 <link>http://www.durexhibit.co.uk/posters/think-478/#c3885</link>
 <pubDate>15th Jan 2008 11:46AM</pubDate>
 <guid>c3885</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
